Review Executive Summary
The Review Executive Summary report page presents the visuals listed below. Each row gives the on-screen name, its underlying metric, and a short description; see the metric glossary for the full formula and interpretation.
Visuals:
| Name | Measure | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total reviews | Count of review IDs (one per performance review) | Total number of performance reviews in scope. It's the base against which the review-status, alignment, and rating measures are read, so every review share on the page is relative to it. It counts reviews, not people, though typically each worker has one review per cycle. Read the completion and alignment percentages relative to this total. |
| Total completed reviews | Count of reviews where the completed flag = Yes | Number of performance reviews that are fully completed, i.e. finished the review cycle overall. It measures review follow-through; read against # Reviews (or via a completion rate) to see how many reviews reached the end. It counts reviews, not people. Note there are separate worker-side ( # Worker review completed ) and manager-side ( # Manager completed review ) completion measures for each party's own status, whereas this is the overall completion. |
| Completion rate | Count of reviews where completed flag = Yes÷ count of all reviews | Share of performance reviews that are fully completed, i.e. the overall review completion rate. It puts # Completed reviews in context so cycles or teams of different sizes compare fairly; a low or falling rate flags reviews stalling before completion. It counts reviews, not people. Read against the worker-side and manager-side completion rates to see which party is holding reviews up. |
| Reviews with worker/manager alignment | Count of reviews where final alignment = Yes÷ count of all reviews | Share of reviews where the worker's self-rating matched the calibrated final rating. It puts the final-alignment count in context so groups of different sizes compare fairly; a higher rate means workers' self-view largely agrees with where reviews land, a low rate flags divergence after calibration. Read against the initial-alignment rate to see whether the review process narrows or widens the gap. |
| Review completion | Count of reviews where Worker Final Review Status = Completed | Number of reviews the worker has completed their part of, i.e. finished their self-review side. It isolates the worker's contribution to review progress, separate from the manager's; read against # Reviews (or the worker completion rate) to see how many workers have done their part. A gap versus # Manager completed review shows which side is holding reviews up. It counts reviews, not people. |
| Total challenged reviews | Count of reviews where the review was challenged (worker or manager+1 formally contested the rating) | Number of performance reviews that were challenged, i.e. where the worker (or the manager's manager) disputed the rating rather than accepting it. It flags friction in the review process; a rising figure signals more workers contesting outcomes. It counts reviews, not people. Read against # Reviews for the challenge share. |
This is a tip message.
For more information about the visuals and metrics used in Analytics Hub, refer toVisuals in Analytics hub and Metric dictionary, respectively.