Pay & Performance
The Pay & Performance report page provides a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between employee performance ratings and salary increases throughout the organization. It presents key metrics such as average, median, minimum, and maximum salary increases, broken down by performance rating. The report allows users to analyze the percentage of employees receiving proposals by their performance rating and visualize the distribution of salary increases across different performance tiers. Furthermore, it includes a detailed breakdown of average salary increases by both job grade and performance rating, culminating in a detailed table of individual workers, which can be filtered to understand pay and performance data at the employee level.
The view of the report page containing all the visuals is presented in the following picture:
The Pay & Performance report page
Visuals:
| Name | Measure | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Avg. % Salary increase | Average salary-increase percentage across workers who have a salary proposal | Average size of the proposed increase, as a percent of current salary, over workers who actually have a proposal (others excluded). It summarizes how generous increases are on average and re-bases when you filter to a team, job family, or grade. Read against Median increase to see whether a few large increases pull the average up. Counts workers, not users. |
| Median % Salary increase | Median salary-increase percentage across workers who have a salary proposal | The middle increase, so half of workers with a proposal get more and half less. Less sensitive to outliers than the average, so a gap between the two signals skew. Read against Avg. salary increase to gauge how lopsided the spread is. |
| Max. % Salary increase | Highest salary-increase percentage among workers who have a salary proposal | The largest proposed increase in view, as a percent of salary. It marks the top of the range. Read against Min. increase for the full spread. |
| Min. % Salary increase | Lowest salary-increase percentage among workers who have a salary proposal | The smallest proposed increase in view, as a percent of salary; can be negative if any proposal cuts pay. It marks the bottom of the range. Read against Max. increase for the full spread. |
| % Workers by performance rating | For each performance rating, count of workers with that rating÷ total count of workers | Distribution of workers across performance ratings. Read against % Salary increase by performance rating to see how increases track with performance. Counts workers. |
| % Salary increase by performance rating | Average salary-increase percentage across workers who have a salary proposal | Average size of the proposed increase, as a percent of current salary, over workers who actually have a proposal (others excluded). It summarizes how generous increases are on average and re-bases when you filter to a team, job family, or grade. Read against Median increase to see whether a few large increases pull the average up. Counts workers, not users. |
| Total salary increase amount by performance rating | Average salary-increase percentage across workers who have a salary proposal | Average size of the proposed increase, as a percent of current salary, over workers who actually have a proposal (others excluded). It summarizes how generous increases are on average and re-bases when you filter to a team, job family, or grade. Read against Median increase to see whether a few large increases pull the average up. Counts workers, not users. |
| Avg. salary inc. % job level and performance rating | Average salary-increase percentage among workers with a proposal, by job level and performance rating | A matrix of the average proposed increase for each job level crossed with each performance rating, so pay increases can be read against both level and performance. Same average as Avg. salary increase , split two ways. Read against Average % Salary increase by job level / grade for the level-only view. |
| Workers having proposal | For each proposal status (has a salary proposal or not), count of distinct workers ÷ total workers | Share of workers who have a salary proposal versus those who do not, shown as a donut whose two slices sum to 100%. It gives the proposal-coverage split at a glance and re-bases when filtered to a team, job family, or grade. Read against Workers with Proposal (count) for the absolute number of workers with a proposal. |
| Pay range penetration (before review) | For each performance rating, count of workers in each pay-range-penetration band, using pay before increases | Distribution of workers across pay-range penetration bands (below, within, above range) by performance rating, on current pay before the round's increases. Read against Pay range penetration (after review) for the effect of the proposed increases. Counts workers. |
| Pay range penetration (after review) | For each performance rating, count of workers in each pay-range-penetration band, using pay after proposed increases | The same pay-range-penetration distribution recomputed with the proposed increases applied. Read against Pay range penetration (before review) for the before/after comparison. Counts workers. |
| Min, median, max % Salary increase by performance Rating | Average salary-increase percentage across workers who have a salary proposal | Average size of the proposed increase, as a percent of current salary, over workers who actually have a proposal (others excluded). It summarizes how generous increases are on average and re-bases when you filter to a team, job family, or grade. Read against Median increase to see whether a few large increases pull the average up. Counts workers, not users. |
| Average % Salary increase by org level and perfomance rating | Average salary-increase percentage across workers who have a salary proposal | Average size of the proposed increase, as a percent of current salary, over workers who actually have a proposal (others excluded). It summarizes how generous increases are on average and re-bases when you filter to a team, job family, or grade. Read against Median increase to see whether a few large increases pull the average up. Counts workers, not users. |