Behaviors Overview
The Behaviors Overview report page presents the visuals listed below. Each row gives the on-screen name, its underlying metric, and a short description; see the metric glossary for the full formula and interpretation.
Visuals:
| Name | Measure | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total behaviors | Count of behavior records (one per behavior referenced in feedback) | Total number of behaviors cited across feedback, in scope. It counts behavior instances, not feedback items and not people, so one feedback citing three behaviors adds three. It sizes how much feedback is anchored to the behavior framework by volume. Read against # Feedback sent and # Feedback with behaviors . |
| Avg. behaviors per feedback | Sum of behaviors across feedback÷ count of feedback items | verage number of behaviors cited per piece of feedback, i.e. how richly feedback is tagged to the competency/value framework. A value near or below 1 means most feedback references at most one behavior (or none), higher means feedback consistently anchors to several behaviors. It divides total behaviors by all feedback, so feedback with no behaviors drags it down. Read against % Feedback with behaviors to separate breadth of tagging from depth. |
| Feedback with behaviors | Count of feedback items that reference ≥1 behavior÷ count of all feedback items | Share of feedback that is tied to at least one behavior from the competency/values framework, rather than free-form only. It puts # Feedback with behaviors in context so periods with different feedback volumes compare fairly, showing how structured and framework-aligned the feedback culture is. A low rate means most feedback is unstructured; a higher rate means people are anchoring feedback to defined behaviors. |
| Behavior count distribution | Count of behavior references, by behavior | How behavior citations spread across the behavior framework, showing which behaviors get referenced most in feedback. It counts behavior instances, not feedback items or people, so a behavior cited across many feedbacks shows a larger slice. The donut renders each behavior as a share of the total, so it reads as the behavior mix rather than raw counts. Read against # Behaviors sent for the overall volume. |
| Behavior distribution | Count of behavior references, by behavior | How behavior citations spread across the behavior framework, showing which behaviors get referenced most in feedback. It counts behavior instances, not feedback items or people, so a behavior cited across many feedbacks shows a larger slice. The donut renders each behavior as a share of the total, so it reads as the behavior mix rather than raw counts. Read against # Behaviors sent for the overall volume. |
| Behaviors sent over time | Count of behavior references, by date (behaviors cited each period) | Number of behaviors cited in feedback in each period, plotted as a trend. Each point is that period's total, not a running total, so it shows the rhythm of behavior-tagging over time (spikes around review cycles, quiet stretches). It counts behavior instances, not feedback or people. Read against # Feedback sent over time to see whether behavior tagging keeps pace with feedback volume. |
| Stacked behaviors sent by org level | Count of behavior records sent (one per behavior referenced in feedback) | Number of behaviors referenced in the feedback that was given, in scope. Behaviors are the competency/value tags on feedback, so this counts behavior instances, not feedback items and not people; one feedback citing three behaviors adds three. It shows how much feedback is anchored to the behavior framework by volume. Read against # Feedback sent and # Feedback with behaviors . |